What is Cloud-Native Monitoring?

Cloud and cloud-based technologies are at their peak today. More and more organizations are turning to intelligent architectures and systems to deploy their apps. And they are not wrong—the cloud has proven to be a great way of performance optimization and cost-cutting. However, there are issues to address with this growing trend. One of those is monitoring.

Monitoring is a vital part of application maintenance. With the growing cloud adoption trend, monitoring distributed apps based on remote cloud infrastructure has become quite an issue. However, many platforms and vendors have tried to solve this problem, giving birth to the concept of cloud-native monitoring.

In this guide, we will talk about cloud-native monitoring and how it is different from traditional monolithic app monitoring. We will also discuss the various areas on which it focuses. Without further ado, let’s begin!

Feel free to navigate this guide using the links below:

How Do We Define “Cloud-Native Monitoring?”

Cloud-native monitoring is the process of leveraging cloud systems to monitor cloud-native or distributed applications. Cloud-native monitoring mainly focuses on microservices-based or distributed monolithic applications. Naturally, it utilizes the cloud for storing and processing logs.

Cloud-native monitoring aims at improving the traditional DevOps process, and machine learning is a powerful tool it implements to track possible issues before they happen. The other thing that cloud-native monitoring is crazy about is the real-time, consistent data availability. The closely-knit structure of cloud-native monitoring does not allow for any issues or events to pass under the radar—everything must be tracked and analyzed.

Monitoring Cloud-Based vs. Monolithic Applications

Monitoring has always been about applications and services. Most leading monitoring solutions of today were born in a time when cloud or cloud-native was not prevalent. Hence they were meant for monolithic applications deployed on conventional servers. However, today’s apps are not built as monolithic instances on a single server; they are broken down and composed using services and microservices.

Therefore monitoring has had to grow and adapt to such architectures. Modern cloud-native monitoring is much more than just tracking and logging each system component. It is an ecosystem of observing each aspect of your system components aided with machine-learning-enabled tools that help you look into the past, present, and the predicted future of your system.

High-Impact Metrics: What Should We Monitor?

Before getting started with Cloud-Native monitoring, you should understand your monitoring aims and benchmarks. Without a well-defined set of metrics and methods, it can be challenging to understand if your cloud-monitoring efforts are going in the right direction. This section will discuss the four pillars of monitoring and how you can apply them to cloud-native monitoring for optimal results.

The Four Golden Signals

Monitoring of any kind relies on four standard, highly extensible metrics. These metrics, when put together, can give you all the information that you need about your system’s performance and health. 

These four metrics are latency, traffic, errors, and saturation (Google’s SRE handbook.) They are used in all aspects of monitoring to gain actionable insights.


You can view latency as the time it takes for a system or a service to fulfill a request. Latency is a broad term that covers the time taken for the request to travel to and from the service via the network and the time taken to process and return a result for the request. In case of a failure, the time taken for the service to produce an appropriate response can be unpredictable due to irregular error management practices.

Therefore it is crucial that you understand and analyze the latency numbers for successful and unsuccessful results separately. This, in no way, means that you should ignore error latency. Error latency helps you understand which segments of your app do not handle errors appropriately. Hence tracking them can help you improve the error management measures implemented in your application. 


You can view traffic as a measure of how much workload is being sent to your system regularly. There are various ways to measure this metric depending upon the system under consideration. For instance, database-specific systems will define traffic as the number of database transactions made every second. A REST API would define traffic as the number of HTTP requests it receives per second. For a video streaming service, traffic can be both bytes downloaded per second or concurrent streaming connections. 

In any case, you must monitor the health and performance of your application with rising and falling traffic values to understand how well your system can scale and adapt to users’ needs.


You can view errors as the number of requests that fail to provide the right results to the end-users. This failure could be in multiple forms—an explicit failure of HTTP requests, a successful HTTP request that returns undesired results, or slow requests that exceed the set service standards. Monitoring these forms can be a daunting task in itself, as even though all of these are errors, they occur at different places and require various measures to identify.

Error tracking is an independent segment of monitoring with dedicated techniques and solutions. Many solutions simplify this process by collecting stack traces and environment information to identify the cause of errors and aid in the resolution process. Keeping an eye on this metric ensures that you strive to deliver the promised level of services to your users.


You can view saturation as how full or loaded your system is. It can measure what fraction of your memory or CPU is utilized constantly. It can also indicate how much of your processing bandwidth (network or I/O) is used by your end-users continuously. Saturation is an important metric because system performance changes according to changing utilization numbers. Your system might not behave the same at 80% utilization as it did at 40%. Therefore you need to set a target for how much your system should stay saturated for best performance.

Saturation can help you set realistic workload targets. For instance, you could aim for building a service that can automatically handle a 10-20% change in incoming traffic. Or a service that can scale automatically to handle double or half of its target workload. Such systems are difficult to build and even more challenging to monitor and test. Tracking saturation can give you an excellent place to start.

The USE Method

The USE method is a decade-old technique used to analyze and improve the performance of cloud computing environments. Brendan Gregg talked about it at length in the paper Thinking Methodically About Performance published in ACMQ. The USE method is:“For every resource, check the Utilization, Saturation, and Errors”. 

In the above expansion, this is what the terms stand for:

In a nutshell, you create a checklist of metrics as suggested above and troubleshoot issues in a fixed order following the list. Brendan has also published an extensive blog on this technique and its implementation, where you can learn more about it.

The RED Method

The RED Method is based on the USE method but is constrained to service monitoring only. Coined at Weaveworks by Tom Wilkie and the team, the RED method focuses on monitoring your application from the end user’s point of view. Here’s what the terms in the abbreviation stand for:

Instead of adapting to the needs of every microservice uniquely, the RED method suggests standardizing the process and metrics. This will give you numerous opportunities to automate tasks and reduce your DevOps workload. You can read more about it on the Weaveworks blog.

Tools for Monitoring Cloud-Based Applications

Once you understand what to look for, all you need is the right set of tools. This section will discuss some essential tools to easily monitor cloud-native and cloud-based applications.


NetData.Cloud is an open-source distributed systems monitoring platform for cloud ecosystems. The most striking feature of this tool is that it is entirely free to use. NetData provides real-time insights into infrastructure and applications, and it also monitors vulnerabilities inside the systems. You can instantly diagnose slow-down and anomalies with many metrics, visualizations, and insightful health alarms.





Dynatrace is one of the few full-stack observability solutions that prioritize users in their monitoring methodology. With Dynatrace, you can also monitor your cloud apps, infrastructures, and logs. You need to install a single running agent that you can control with the Dynatrace UI, and this makes installation and usage of the tool relatively easy. Dynatrace is available in SaaS, Managed, and On-Premise models.




New Relic

New Relic is a cloud monitoring solution that aims to easily help you manage advanced and ever-changing cloud infrastructure. It can let you know how your cloud infrastructure and apps are running in real-time. You can also gain valuable insights into your app stack, view them in rich dashboards, avail distributed tracing support, and more. The installation process might be a little complex compared to other tools, but there are steps outlined in their documentation.





DataDog is a SaaS-based monitoring solution that began as an infrastructure monitoring service but later expanded into application performance and other forms of monitoring. DataDog’s service can easily integrate with hundreds of cloud apps and software platforms. However, its configuration-based agent installation service is time-consuming to complete, and getting started with the tool requires some time and effort.





SolarWinds is another full-stack cloud performance monitoring platform that offers network monitoring and database monitoring solutions. It monitors the health and performance status of apps, servers, data storage, and virtual machines. SolarWinds provides an interactive visualization platform with which you can quickly receive insights from thousands of metrics collected from your infrastructure. The platform also includes troubleshooting and error remediation tools for real-time responses to detected issues.




How to Scale Cloud-Native Monitoring Efforts

As your cloud-native setup starts to grow, you will need to scale your monitoring setup. And we are not talking about provisioning another virtual machine or physical server. We are talking about hundreds and thousands of containers provisioned and scraped based on user demands.

There are two possible approaches to scaling your cloud-native monitoring efforts. The first one is to opt for a federated monitoring infrastructure. In this case, a tree of monitoring servers deploys. The monitoring server at each branch collects monitoring results from its lower branches, and the lowermost servers are attached directly to each data center of the cloud-native infrastructure.  This is how it looks:

While such a structure achieves coverage, the breakdown of one of the monitoring servers can result in vast and irreparable loss of monitoring data. This is where High Availability (HA) distribution comes in. HA distribution suggests using two monitoring servers at each location instead of one to maintain a redundant copy of data. You can then use this to recreate the lost data.

Another solution to the cloud-native monitoring scaling problem is reorganizing your human resources. You should consider splitting your engineering workforce into explicit, dedicated teams such as frontend, backend, DevOps, etc. You can then provide these teams with their unique monitoring tools and techniques. If these teams have their roles defined clearly from the start, it becomes easy to find the right person who can help the situation in times of an outage.

Closing Thoughts

Cloud-native is on the rise in today’s world. More and more companies are adopting Kubernetes and Docker to speed up their development and improve the quality of services. In times like these, monitoring techniques and solutions need to keep up with the growing technologies.

This article showed you the significance of cloud-native monitoring and compared it with monitoring monolithic applications hosted on the cloud. We also mentioned an array of methods that you can use to monitor and analyze your cloud-native applications effectively. Then we provided a quick roundup of the popular tools used for cloud-native monitoring. Finally, we brought our discussion to a close by stating two methods to scale up your monitoring efforts quickly. We hope that this article may help you find the proper monitoring tool and technique for your next cloud-native application.

Scout can help you achieve the 99.99% availability mark when it comes to monitoring. Try the tool out today with a 14-day free trial (and by free, we mean no credit card, too!) and test it yourself!

For more in-depth content around web development and performance, navigate our blog and feel free to explore Scout APM with a free 14-day trial!